Ghostface- Crack Spot Haley Bonar- Am I Allowed? So apparently Santino is having a yard sale tomorrow morning. Prepare to see a pestilence of chunky-sunglassed hipster atrocities (myself included, of course) descend on Beachwood Dr. tomorrow morning at the crack of dawn.
I don't mean to hop this late on the party wagon for Band of Horses, but I must admit- they pretty much killed it the other night at King King. Giant shimmering walls of guitars that were definitely the result of a band playing dyed-in-the-wool nineties indie rock for ten years and finally deciding that they can do better. Their singer looks like the cover of Either/Or- trucker hat, eight-o-clock shadow, howling wounded love and songs about my beloved
St. Augustine (okay, can't really prove that last part, but it still stands). Oh, and CB saw an almost-fight where some Hollywood cheesedick was pissed about having to stand in the guestlist line and asks the bouncer "So where does the producer of the record get to stand?" To which someone behind him yelled "Where does the inventor of the phonograph stand? Where does the Sun God stand?" Said cheesedick then proceeds to find the guy and declare "I'm going to punch you...in the face!" but to no avail. Funny, if there's any one place one could be a smartass and shoot their mouth off and not expect to get fought, it's at a Band of Horses show. Hollywood draws all types, I guess. Partying with your editor is a blast.
Oh, also...there's been grumbling of a live Coachella blog that I may or may not (leaning towards may) be a part of. You know what that means- sunburns, $5 bottled water and getting drunk in a tent with wi-fi hookups.
...So me and GB have been having this ongoing tag team throwdown with MG and MB about if whether or not an artist's impact on society and the public perception thereof has any bearing on the quality of the work itself. The M's in the negative, GB and I in the affirmative. Personally, I don't see the argument against it. If the quality of one's art stops at the threshold of its completion, then you've pretty much got to take their word for it that it's the best art ever, and that there isn't really a standard to be set- if it's the fullest realization of their particular vision, then it's good. But, as we so deftly pointed out in the back table of El Compadre- that means anyone from Jack Johnson to Leni Reifenstahl could lay claim on having the purest and most complete (therefore best) artistic document. The former sucks, the latter is evil, and that leaves you an untenable argument. Even the language we use to talk about this stuff is a cultural determinant. The idea to pick up a guitar is one. The instinct to judge against judgement is one. I'd argue that art only really exists at all in the impact it has on society at large (and small). Yes, I understand that it's difficult, and great stuff is ignored, bad stuff accepted and disseminated, often at the expense of what's good, yeah, but that doesn't mean that because it's hard and often unfair that it isn't right. I have no patience for art that doesn't "do" soemthing, be it to shake your ass or make you cry or treat someone gently or solve a hunger crisis. Art is a communication, it isn't a finite object meant to be relicized and locked away as some idol, only dragged out to bolster one's identity as an artist or art-goer. Finishing the thing is just the start of it's life, and whatever you gotta do in your bedroom to get it there is beside the point- once you seal the envelope, we're all going to open it and decide how we want to take it. You're going to be accountable for what you say, even if we get it all wrong. It's up to both sides to be responsible in how they write. Yay criticism. I'm going to play mandolin all day tomorrow.
The above are two random things I'm enjoying as of 6:24 PST. The new Ghost kills. Sasha
likes it too. Off to The Smell to see a bunch of hardcore bands. New piece on Fall Out Boy in Thursday (with quotes from a certain VP of Def Jam who you may find familiar). Take care kids-
-A